Blaise Tapp column

Blaise Tapp.
Blaise Tapp.
0
Have your say

An Only Fools and Horses’ fan has shelled out £4,000 on a tattoo which covers every inch of his back. It really does take all sorts.

The inkwork adorning Darren Williams’ body took 50 hours to complete over the course of six weeks and this obvious ordeal has left me asking one simple question: why?

While this chap’s devotion to the nation’s most cherished comedy show might be admired by some it would not be unreasonable to ask whether he could have spent the money on a signed photograph of David Jason and I am sure he could have picked up a yellow Reliant Robin van for not much more than he paid for the tattoo.

Apart from a brief yearning in the 1990s to have an Indian chieftain branded on my chest, I have never been a fan of tatts. It now seems that I might soon be among the minority as everywhere you look today there is someone sporting a piece of body art.

I was brought up to believe that anyone with a tattoo was to be avoided and chaps with panthers, swifts and spiders on their necks were most definitely jailbirds.

When my pals started getting tattoos it was often done as an act of rebellion but that can longer be the case of millions of others can it?

While there are no reliable financial figures available, tattoos are clearly a booming business and every reasonable sized town has at least one parlour. Icons such as David Beckham who has the best part of 40 all over his body have enabled tattoos to become mainstream and respectable.

Perhaps the main reason why I haven’t acted on the urges of my juvenile years is my 93-year-old grandad. He got inked in his teens at the start of the Second World War courtesy of a comrade by the name of Taff and he has regretted it ever since.

I could not tell you what the 75-year-old artwork depicts as they have long become greeny blue blobs.

Granted, tattoos have come a hell of a long way since the early 1940s but it is not an easy thing to correct if you change your mind.