DCSIMG

City council ‘breaks promise’ to community over Luneside East

Luneside East, which is being demolished to make way for new development.

Luneside East, which is being demolished to make way for new development.

Residents in the Long Marsh Lane area of Lancaster claim Lancaster City Council has broken a long-standing promise in terms of the Luneside East housing project.

The recent planning application submitted by Persimmon Homes shows that half of the former railway embankment bordering Long Marsh Lane will be removed, along with all of the trees that are currently on the embankment.

Coun Jon Barry said local people are angry at the plans.

He said: “The city council has undertaken a lot of consultation with local residents about Luneside East since the project started in around 1997.

“From numerous meetings, the two important demands from residents were that there should be no vehicular access from Long Marsh Lane and that the embankment between Long Marsh Lane and Luneside East should be retained.

“Both of these demands were agreed by the city council and have formed the basis of approvals for the project by cabinet and the council’s planning policy committee.”

Long Marsh Lane resident Julia Russell said: “I am extremely disappointed that the council has gone back on its word.

“It makes a mockery of the idea of public consultation that a plan which is so long approved can be changed so drastically at the last minute and without any further discussion with residents.

“I and many other local residents were satisfied with the outcome of the many previous public consultation meetins we attended as, while wish to see this brownfield site developed, we also wanted the unique character of this area maintained with its mature trees and feeling of a quiet green oasis.

“When the site was being decontaminated using EU funding, we were again told that the embankment would be retained.

“Now a developer is being allowed free rein to maximise their profits and the local community’s views on which the original plans were approved mean nothing.“

Vincent Spratling was chairman of the Long Marsh Lane Action Group in 1999 and still lives in Hasgill Court, next to the proposed development.

He said: “I was not against the development in principle then and I am not now.

“Generally there was support for the scheme, but local people were unanimous on two points.

“Firstly we wanted all the railway embankment to be left completely alone, as it provides a valued green area and acts as a natural barrier against wind and the noise and pollution from Morecambe road.

“Secondly we did not want an access road from the development through to Long Marsh Lane, as this is unnecessary as access is already available through St George’s Quay and Lune Road.”

Residents and ward councillors have demanded an urgent meeting with council officers to see if progress can be made towards saving the embankment.

Coun Janice Hanson, cabinet member with responsibility for regeneration, said: “The council has advised the developer about the community’s expectations in relation to the former railway embankment.

“Our recommendation was that Persimmon should undertake detailed community engagement before promoting a scheme which departed from the original ideas for the site.

“However, they have chosen not to do so and ultimately it will be for the planning committee to determine whether the changes, when compared to the original aspirations for the site, are so material and harmful that they justify withholding planning permission.”

 

Comments

 
 

Back to the top of the page