City bucks the rich list trend

Lancaster Town Hall.

Lancaster Town Hall.

Have your say

Town halls across Lancashire paid six-figure salaries to 50 council officials last year – while suffering devastating cuts to their budgets.

Lancaster City Council was one of only two that bucked the trend - alongside Burnley- of increasing the number of six figure earners.

Lancaster has reduced from three to one, Burnley from two to one.

The county rich list figures are a a 25 per cent increase on the previous 12 months, and include England’s highest-paid local government employee David McElhinney, who pocketed £280,000 from Lancashire County Council for heading the now defunct One Connect Limited – on top of a similar role for Liverpool City Council.

While the number of senior council staff earning more than £100,000 fell nationally, the Red Rose county showed an increase of a quarter on the 40 officers who were taking home bumper pay packets a year earlier.

The revelations come in the latest Town Hall Rich List, an annual survey by the Taxpayers’ Alliance. A spokesman said: “Sadly too many local authorities are still increasing the number of highly paid staff on their payroll.”

In Lancashire the biggest number of top-bracket earners came at County Hall where 13 staff were paid £100,000-plus in 2012/13.

The county council is currently downsizing, trying to lose 2,500 jobs and make budget cuts of £300m .

Of the districts which form part of the county council, Preston was in front with five – an increase of two on the previous 12 months. 
Chorley was up from two to three. West Lancashire paid two executives over £100,000.All the other district authorities, South Ribble, Fylde, Wyre, Lancaster, Ribble Valley, Rossendale, Burnley, Hyndburn and 
Pendle, had one six-figure earner each - their chief executives.

Coun Jennifer Mein, Lancashire County Council leader said: “We’re making significant reductions in the number of senior officers at the county council as part of delivering the £300m savings we have to achieve by 2018. Reductions in the number of senior posts will continue to be disproportionately high compared to other parts of the workforce .”

Back to the top of the page