Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

South Lakes Windows Ltd
 
 
Thursday, 2nd September 2010

I'll stop £140m bypass vows defiant granny

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
27 March 2008
A GRANDMOTHER has lodged a last-ditch legal bid to prevent the £140million M6 bypass being built behind her home.
Linda Davies, of Russell Drive, Torrisholme, is desperate to halt the road from ploughing through greenbelt land – and she is willing to fight it out with county highways bosses and the government in the High Court.

Defiant Mrs Davies, who has liv
ed in Torrisholme for more than 40 years, has secured legal aid and has challenged her lawyers to find points of appeal in the planning application, which was approved by the secretary of state last month.

Mrs Davies, a retired social worker and a former teacher at Lancaster and Morecambe College, said: "I was intending to spend my last years in this house.

"I have been identified with Torrisholme all my life and I am concerned about the environment.

"That piece of land behind my house is all that remains of Torrisholme as was written in the Domesday Book.

"It is an attractive piece of land and I want to preserve it for my grandchildren – we should have some green space."

Mrs Davies' lawyers, Essex-based EarthRights, have written to Lancashire County Council outlining their three-pronged appeal after campaigners from Transport Solutions for Lancaster and Morecambe (TSLM) declined to mount a legal bid.

EarthRights argue that the road's environmental assessment was "inadequate" and say the park-and-ride, which would be built close to junction 34 of the M6, was not subject to the same probe.

The legal team also claim the county council failed to assess properly alternative measures, such as public transport, and did not look into the risk of flooding.

Mrs Davies added: "There are some legal points that have been identified that have not been addressed properly.

"The point is that it's £140million for that road and at the end of it people are still going to be sitting in traffic jams on Morecambe Road.

"Most people in Lancaster and Morecambe want to get in and out and think the link road will ease congestion.

"They will be disappointed when all that money gets spent and they are still sat in traffic.

"The road will have an adverse affect on the quality of life for
people round here. I am disappointed and I will be furious if it goes ahead."

A date, expected to be later this year, will now be fixed for
the hearing at London's High Court.

Ian Blinkho, the county council's principal solicitor, said he expected Hazel Blears, the secretary of state for communities and local government, to defend the bypass "robustly".

He added: "The county council is confident that it did all that was required and that the case is sound."

Earlier this month, the Guardian revealed the cost of building the Heysham to M6 link road had rocketed from £105million to £140million in just five weeks. However, county highways bosses have said they are confident of securing funding for the scheme from the Department for Transport.

Community Guide




Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 March 2008 12:07 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Lancaster
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Paul Dr,

Lancaster 27/03/2008 14:37:25
Has anyone ever seen those Natterjack toads that were supposed to be the reason for not having the Western bypass?
They popped up rather suddenly and conveniently but I cannot find any mention of them for several years; yet supposedly they were listed as the main reason that route was dropped.
If they are no longer around that would be a good argument for holding back on the Northern route.
2

Beau,

Lancaster 27/03/2008 15:31:35
Forget the toads and newts, the reason the Western route was dropped was that it was to be single carriageway. The Northern route would be dual carriageway.
Single carriageway is no good for the Government, they are pushing freight on roads not rail. The Link (note its not described as a bypass)is all about attracting lorries to use Heysham port.
Its a shame that there is no congestion relief for the poor local folk who are supposed to submissively put up with it.
Good luck to this lady.
3

Diddydums,

Lancaster 01/04/2008 08:48:21
Neither the north or western bypass will solve the traffic problems in Lancaster. More roads equals more traffic A bypass will make no difference what so ever to the problems traffic in and around Lancaster and Morecambe, Lancaster could solve a lot of its problems by having two-way traffic, less buses going to the Uni which most of the time are half empty and the other half local residents cannot find a seat. I believe the most of those that want the bypass drive drive their the children the 1000 yards from the front door to the school playground and the same to work. But I feel that the decision has already been made and even if every person in Lancaster objected to it the bypass would still go ahead, since when has the government every listened to reason or backed down and the payments have already been made!
4

impaler81,

Morecambe 02/04/2008 23:18:12
I cant believe how many people are opposed to this and why.

The people that largely contribute to the cause of traffic along Morecambe road and through Torrisholme are those who are trying to get to the Motorway. This is all those who work in Preston, Blackpool and beyond, along with the many lorries that you see parked in the daily tailbacks.

I work in Blackburn and am sick to death of waiting in traffic, behind the regular three buses that block the road by picking up a couple of school kids in the centre of Torrisholme, the parents blocking roads dropping off kids at school in their big unecessary 4x4's and the fact I have go all the way into Lancaster to get to the motorway. It takes a pathetic 30 minutes to get from Morecambe to the north Motorway junction, longer than it takes me to get from this junction to my place of work in Blackburn.

This place needs to evolve just like everywhere else and if that means creating a link to ease traffic then it means just that. Im sure these people would think otherwise if God forbid, a lorry making its way to the motorway happened to run down their child on the narrow, busy roads of Torrisholme.

The only reason why these people are defending it is because they dont see it from a commuters point of view and dont want the value of their homes potentially being affected.

This link cant come soon enough !!!!
5

Emily72,

Morecambe 03/04/2008 13:16:28
So let me get this straight.

* Retired woman living in Torrisholme.
* Had a career at the local college which is a few hundred yards from her house.
* Never commuted properly - yet she thinks making a bypass wont make a difference to the traffic?

Why has this case not been dismissed already?!?!

Simple fact is the only people that dont want the bypass are people that dont drive!
Stop thinking about yourselves and look at the bigger picture!

Oh and as for the comments about it being bad for the environment, what are you talking about? In the long run theres going to be less traffic sitting doing nothing but pumping out fumes when people can quickly get to the motorway! Therefore less fuel being wasted and less emmisions being emitted!
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.