Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

South Lakes Windows Ltd
 
 
Tuesday, 16th March 2010

Health and safety threat to kid's parks

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 February 2010
PLAY areas across the Lancaster district could close while others may
have equipment removed, following a warning from council insurers.
Lancaster City Council has been asked by its insurers to take immediate action to improve the safety of its play facilities or remove them if that is not possible.

And the authority says it simply cannot afford to upgrade all the play areas which need work.

One of the main problems is that some of its 74 play areas do not have special safety surfacing to soften the blow when a child falls.

If it does not act, the council could run the risk of insurers refusing to pay out when someone sues the authority following an accident.

Since April 2006, it has had to cough up more than £73,000 in compensation relating to 10 accidents at its play areas.

The council has reviewed safety at all its facilities following the insurer's letter and is now compiling the results. Play areas in Ambleside Road, Ridge, which has a grass surface, at Arcon House in Scotforth and at Green Street in Bulk ward are among those which could be affected. But Bulk ward councillor, John Whitelegg, said he suspected the insurer's warning was a case of 'health and safety gone bonkers'.

"I agree you should not have concrete surfaces but I can't see what is wrong with grass," he said.

"Are we going to say 'no more grass at Williamson Park' or put signs up there saying, 'No playing on the grass'?

Coun Whitelegg said he would fight any moves to close the Green Street facility, but recognised that it needed improving. "It is in an area of terraced housing where families do not have gardens for their children and there are no alternatives nearby," he said.

As the Lancaster Guardian went to press, councillors were being asked at their monthly meeting to agree to a review which would reduce the number of play areas.

In a report, head of financial services, Nadine Muschamp said: "Given that the council has around 70 sites, it is considered neither practical nor affordable for all play areas to be upgraded. Therefore, any that are not upgraded (and do not meet required standards) will need to be decommissioned."

The council has budgeted to spend £60,000 on improving play areas according to priority in each of the next two years, with another £50,000 a year for minor maintenance. It has spent £137,000 on improvements at 12 high priority play areas since 2006.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 February 2010 9:20 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Lancaster
 
Prev
1
Next
1

nonplussed,

Lancaster 09/02/2010 22:20:47
Surely the council could overcome this problem by displaying disclaimer notices around these play areas?
These signs could also insist upon parental supervision!
2

village idiot downunder,

Sydney 12/02/2010 00:08:12
It's just scandalous, society today is so over protective, exactly as nonplussed says, disclaimers, parental supervison and playground maintenance...............for gods sake what happened to plain old fashioned common sense !!
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.