Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

South Lakes Windows Ltd
 
 
Tuesday, 16th March 2010

Centros blames English Heritage for mess

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 June 2009
CENTROS has launched a blistering attack on English Heritage in the wake of the city council's decision to withdaw from the public inquiry into its £150 million retail-led scheme.
The heritage body has responded by calling on the developer to withdraw its plans.

But Centros says it has no intention of doing so.

Instead, it has urged the secretary of state, John Denham, to make a decision which shows that the regenerati
on of Lancaster 'outweighs the retention of a handful of unremarkable and unlisted buildings'.

Centros chief executive, Richard Wise, said: "It is high time that the government called English Heritage to heel. "Their contribution to this development has been erratic at best and is likely to send shockwaves throughout the property sector as well as local authorities trying to achieve regeneration of their town and city centres.

"In Lancaster, English Heritage firstly failed to engage meaningfully with us in the master-planning process which we began in 2005.

"Then following significant changes that we made in response to their input on our subsequent planning application, they stated that they were happy for Lancaster City Council to decide the application.

"After the council's decision in favour of our development, English Heritage then reneged and campaigned with other members of the heritage lobby for a call in.

"Whilst many people were surprised that we chose not to appear at the inquiry, we did so because we felt so strongly that we should not have to finance a process that was not of our making

"Developers and investors need a level of certainty in the planning process – especially when economic regeneration is at the top of the nation's agenda.

"This level of performance by English Heritage - when their full attention has only really been given to the project at the public inquiry stage - is woeful.

"With the secretary of state giving in to their late intervention, neither developers nor local authorities can have confidence in the planning system.

"But the secretary of state still has the opportunity of demonstrating his authority by making a decision that gives clear guidance to both the council and us as developer that regeneration of Lancaster city centre outweighs the retention of a handful of unremarkable and unlisted buildings.

"If the Government really wants to deliver economic regeneration, then it needs to stand firm in the face of interventions like this and others such as the recent royal one on Chelsea Barracks, so that developers and investors can have confidence in the planning process."

An English Heritage spokeswoman, said: "English Heritage welcomes Lancaster City Council's recognition that there are significant problems with these applications, and also its decision not to present further evidence to the inquiry. "We believe that Centros should now withdraw the applications to avoid the need for the further investment of time and resources in the continuation of the inquiry.

"If the present applications are withdrawn or refused English Heritage will aim to work with Lancaster City Council and other interested parties in the development of proposals that can command widespread support."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 June 2009 4:11 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Lancaster
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Beau,

Lancaster 25/06/2009 17:10:23
The story so far.....the Council points the finger at Centros who point the finger at English Heritage, and still this farce isn't over as the inspector feels obliged to spend yet more public money on a report about flogging a dead horse!
2

Buttress,

25/06/2009 18:30:20
If I was Centros I'd shut up. It has tried to drive a horse and cart through national planning policy, and now is trying to shift the blame. Indeed, parts of the PPG15 assessment (Montagu Evans) are so misleading and inaccurate it is hoped it is drawn to the attention of the Inspector by representatives from the Rule Six parties.

Similarly the council has tried to squirm out of its national obligations to the historic environment.

Chickens are coming home to roost.

3

Buttress,

25/06/2009 18:34:36
What's abundantly clear is that the council passed plans which anyone with any knowlege of heritage policy could see were deeply flawed; it didn't take an inquiry to see that. The errors and omissions in the planning reports were clear, and the PPG15 etc assessments in order to demolish historic buildings (by the council and Montagu Evans) were misleading hogwash.

Thankfully, there seems to be a Conservation Officer who knows the score, and said so. He should be applauded for his honesty and integrity.

Getting into bed with Centros was a very bad move, but the council plodded on, seemingly thinking that national policy for historic buildings could be circumvented by some clever wording and that no-one would notice. They did, and now the price is being paid.

The PR and damage limitation now being carried out is just that. The council and Centros didn't listen to the many objections, all this was raised before the plans were passed, by EH, SAVE, IOC, Statutory Consultees the Victorian Society and the Georgian Group. It seems some on the council thought they knew better, both officers and councillors.

The groups which should be given costs don't include the council, except this has come from the public purse. SAVE is a charity which is funded by private donations, and EH was defending this out of public cash. All those from It's Our City who gave untold hours of time and expertise unpaid cannot be compensated.

Time for some inquiry into the goings on at Lancaster Council, possibly.

Also - Centros Lancaster (as the shell company is known) is registered in the Virgin Islands, I believe,



4

peter peesed,

25/06/2009 23:03:30
i hate centros, its tried to dictate rather than listen to the people. im glad its at least been delayed.
5

Buttress,

26/06/2009 09:39:14
Sounds as though Lancaster has had a lucky escape:-

http://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/daily-news/-tricorn-centre-site-could-stand-empty-for-another-five-years/5204096.article

6

Straight Down The Line,

Portsmouth 27/06/2009 12:48:05
Centros Miller were throwing gifts around like confetti to officers of Portsmouth City Council. This was confirmed, even to the extent of one of the key officers Wendy Couch actually sleeping out with them at Cowes week. The police in Portsmouth let the council investigate itself.

Their is now documented evidence to show how contemptuous PCC and associated parties are of English Heritage. This has not been dislosed yet.

If you look at the design being offered in Lancaster and compere it to Portsmouth, all I can say is that all Centros offer are clone zones.
7

taxibus,

Lancaster 28/06/2009 17:28:14
Its about time people in Lancaster got real and accept that Lancasters shopping centre needs making bigger and better,this would then stop people going to out of town to centres like Preston,Manchester,Liverpool as all of these centres have a bigger range of shops and big stores,but what do we have here BHS M&S BOOTS and loads of mobile phone shops, not that good is it but if thats what you all want then kill off the new centre and keep all the this here (in the yesteryear )
8

Buttress,

29/06/2009 20:48:51
6 Centros may yet be in for surpsrise re its contempt for English Heritage.

Where can this information be found?



9

opensesame,

lancaster 17/08/2009 14:37:34
Preserving what we have left in lancaster is by far the best way to ensure that Lancaster attracts more and more tourist and business income as well as enhancing the residents quality of life LONG TERM. Lancaster is still highly individual in the North West. Invest is preserving and reclaiming heritage for another 20 years and it will be absolutely unique.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.