Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

South Lakes Windows Ltd
 
 
Thursday, 2nd September 2010

350 new city homes get the go-ahead

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 July 2010
PLANS to build more than 350 new homes on derelict land off Lancaster's quayside are back on track.
Lancaster City Council's planning committee this week agreed to extend the time limit on a 2007 outline planning permission for a development at Luneside West for another five years.

The proposals also include industrial and commercial properties,
a neighbourhood centre which could incorporate a shop and other community facilities.

Under an agreement requested by the council, there will be 20 per cent affordable housing, which must all be available for social rent, and a contribution of £597,000 towards public transport improvements.

In 2008 Countryside Properties gained approval for detailed plans to develop the 26-acre site, which lies between the Marsh estate and Lune Business Park and includes the old Williamson's factory.

But Countryside were unable to strike a deal to buy the site from owners Michael and Diane Foy.

The Foys submitted the fresh outline plans and have been in talks with Redrow Homes and Barratt Homes, which lodged a separate detailed planning application last month which would see as many as 400 homes built, but without the industrial or commercial units.

A spokesperson for Redrow Homes said: "It is a joint venture, divided equally between Redrow and Barratt, and if approved will offer a good mix of properties from one-bedroom apartments to four-bedroom detached family homes."

The outline plans received one objection letter, while United Utilities asked for conditions to minimise the risk of flooding.

Andrew Dobson, the council's head of regeneration and policy, said: "Regenerating the quayside is a key aim and the planning committee supported the plans because they will help to achieve this.

"We welcome the investment into the district and look forward to working with the developer to create a development which is good for the people of Lancaster."




Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 July 2010 10:00 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Lancaster
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Patrick,

Lancaster 31/07/2010 14:59:06
<"The Foys submitted the fresh outline plans and have been in talks with Redrow Homes and Barratt Homes, which lodged a separate detailed planning application last month which would see as many as 400 homes built, but without the industrial or commercial units.">

Big mistake. Having nothing but houses there without employment opportunities is a recipe for disaster - and will just create another dormitory ghetto and without the back up extra public transport (just how long will that £597.000 last???) it will simply cause even more traffic chaos in Lancaster.

Why is it that all over the country we have carpeted old industrial areas with housing and no space made for new business/industry. Sure, I know successive Governments have no interest in us manufacturing anything any more - but the only way to make a town work properly is to include a decent mix of Work - Home - Shops. It is the fundamental basic law of town planning.
2

mark67,

02/08/2010 09:49:19
Because thanks to Mrs thatcher we became a nation of shop keepers and now manufacture nothing, better develop the land to house people than leave it derelict for the rats...
3

Patrick,

Lancaster 03/08/2010 12:07:32
Spot on Mark! You know the next step is to sell the whole Island off to the Disney Corporation as one big holiday destination. They're turning Shropshire into a central airport and customs centre. We will all be employed as Meeters, Greeters and Bit Players in the "Ye Olde Engerlande Experience". :)
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.